Updated September 28, 2026 · AffCue Editorial Team

ING vs Wallester

ING scores 9.1 and Wallester 9.5 out of 10. Compare their differences and shared features below.

ING

Facts checked September 26, 2026.

Wallester

Facts checked September 26, 2026.

ING vs Wallester: the differences

ING vs Wallester
Compare
INGING
ReviewSee alternativesSee alternatives
WallesterWallester
ReviewSee alternativesSee alternatives
Commission termsEUR 46.00 CPL per leadEUR 100 + EUR 300 2-step PPL
NetworksFinanceAdsDaisycon, Tradetracker
Recurring commissionNoYesHas it
Payout per sale or signup€46€200Higher

Same on both: Cookie window (60 days), Verticals (Banking).

We earn a commission when you sign up through links on this site. Partner status can affect where a brand appears in our rankings.

Key differences

  • Recurring commission: only Wallester.
  • Payout per sale or signup is higher at Wallester: €200 vs €46.
  • Networks: only ING offers FinanceAds.
  • Networks: only Wallester offers Daisycon, Tradetracker.
  • Founded is lower at ING: 1991 vs 2016.
  • Wallester is available in 4 more countries.
  • Pricing model: only Wallester offers CPA, Revshare, Hybrid.
  • Region: only ING offers Single country.
  • Region: only Wallester offers Europe.

Our verdict on each

ING

ING pays a set CPL for its Conto Arancio offer, so publishers who can deliver a steady flow of qualified banking leads in a single market can count on predictable income. The trade-off is the shape: no recurring commission, a single network, and a window of 60 days.

Read the full ING review

Wallester

Wallester suits publishers with European business and finance audiences who can convert intent into funded accounts, since the offer is a two-step PPL of EUR 100 + EUR 300 2-step PPL on a 60 window. The banking vertical keeps the audience narrow, so volume comes from Europe, not from the wider web.

Read the full Wallester review

How they score

  • Wallester edges ING on cost, 1 facts to 0.
  • On offer the two are close: Wallester wins 1, ING 0.

A third option

Hannoversche has payout per sale or signup at €225, against €46 for ING and €200 for Wallester.

Hannoversche review

Sources behind this comparison

ING

  • financeads.com: 8 facts, checked September 26, 2026
  • en.wikipedia.org: 2 facts, checked September 26, 2026
  • ing.com: 1 fact, checked September 26, 2026

Wallester

  • wallester.com: 7 facts, checked September 26, 2026
  • all-affiliates.com: 2 facts, checked September 26, 2026
  • fintechmagazine.com: 2 facts, checked September 26, 2026
  • rigacomm.com: 1 fact, checked September 26, 2026

How they place

ING vs Wallester
RankingINGWallester
Finance affiliate programs58 of 42514 of 425
Banking and fintech programs13 of 863 of 86

Every fact side by side

ING vs Wallester
FactINGWallester
Pricing modelCPLCPA, CPL, Revshare, HybridCovers more
FeaturesNot confirmedDirect
RegionSingle countryEurope
Legal entityING Groep N.V.Wallester AS
HeadquartersNetherlandsEstonia
Founded1991Lower2016

Where each stands against the rest

ING vs Wallester
FactINGWallesterMedian
Cookie window60 dayshighest quarter60 dayshighest quarter30 days
Payout per sale or signup€46below the median€200highest quarter€50

Median across 146 listed affiliate programs.

Pros and cons

ING

Pros

  • A fixed rate of EUR 46.00 CPL per lead makes lead value easy to forecast.
  • A 60 day window gives comparison style banking content room to convert.
  • Banking focus (banking) slots straight into sites already writing about current accounts.

Cons

  • Recurring commission is not offered, so an approved lead pays once and nothing follows.
  • Only single country traffic earns, so an international audience converts at a lower rate.
  • The 60 day window ranks 23 of 129 on cookie length.

Wallester

Pros

  • Two-step PPL of EUR 100 + EUR 300 2-step PPL pays on a qualified lead that becomes a funded account.
  • cpa, cpl and revshare gives publishers a choice of models rather than a single payout type.
  • Recurring commission is on, so an account that keeps its balance keeps paying.

Cons

  • europe caps the audience, so North American traffic has little to convert here.
  • banking is narrow, which limits the number of pages a publisher can write.
  • The programme pays on a two-step PPL under EUR 100 + EUR 300 2-step PPL, so a lead that stalls before funding pays nothing.

Who each suits

ING

Who it suits

  • Publishers with steady banking lead volume in a single market who can hit a known CPL.
  • Sites that write current account comparisons, where a 60 day window is enough to convert.
  • Publishers already inside financeAds who want a finance programme to add to an existing slate.

Who should look elsewhere

  • Publishers who need several payout triggers: Mintos pays Hybrid lead and CPA commission rather than a flat CPL.
  • Anyone chasing a share of sales: Admitad pays 5% per sale on a different basis.
  • Publishers after a registration bonus: Qonto pays CPA per registration plus KYB bonus and adds a bonus for verified businesses.

Wallester

Who it suits

  • Publishers running finance or small business content for European readers
  • Sites with an audience that already trusts banking and fintech brands
  • Network affiliates who want a second, recurring option alongside a per-approval offer

Who should look elsewhere

  • Publishers chasing North American audiences, since the programme runs in europe
  • Anyone wanting a wide vertical mix, because the offer sits in banking only
  • Publishors who need long decision windows, since the window is 60 days

Country by country

ING vs Wallester
CountryINGWallester
FranceNoYes
GermanyNoYes
ItalyYesNo
SpainNoYes
United KingdomNoYes
United StatesNoYes

Questions about each

ING

What does the ING programme pay for a lead?+

ING pays EUR 46.00 CPL per lead on the current account offer, and cpl shows the model is CPL. Payment attaches to the lead rather than to any later account activity, so the rate is easy to plan around but capped at a single payout per lead.

How long is the cookie window on ING leads?+

The window runs 60 days from the click. On the site that is a middle of the pack figure: the median across listed programmes is 30 days and the upper quartile 60 days, so a longer comparison style article should still convert inside the ING window.

Wallester

How much does Wallester pay per approved account?+

The per-approval payout is €200, paid under a two-step PPL of EUR 100 + EUR 300 2-step PPL. A lead that never turns into a funded account earns nothing, so lead quality matters more than lead volume here. The model list is cpa, cpl and revshare.

How long is the cookie window?+

The window runs 60 days. That is longer than the finance median of 30 days, so a reader who takes a fortnight to open a business account can still be credited. It is shorter than the 90 day ceiling seen in the banking and fintech group.

Wallester

Wallester

Higher score in this comparison

See alternatives