Updated September 28, 2026 · AffCue Editorial Team
TF Bank AT vs Wallester
Facts checked September 26, 2026.
Facts checked September 26, 2026.
Where TF Bank AT and Wallester differ
| Compare |  TF Bank AT |  Wallester |
|---|---|---|
| Commission terms | 50 EUR per activated card | EUR 100 + EUR 300 2-step PPL |
| Cookie window | 30 days | 60 daysHigher |
| Networks | FinanceAds | Daisycon, Tradetracker |
| Recurring commission | No | YesHas it |
| Payout per sale or signup | €50 | €200Higher |
| Verticals | Banking, LendingCovers more | Banking |
We earn a commission when you sign up through links on this site. Partner status can affect where a brand appears in our rankings.
Key differences
- Cookie window is higher at Wallester: 60 days vs 30 days.
- Recurring commission: only Wallester.
- Payout per sale or signup is higher at Wallester: €200 vs €50.
- Networks: only TF Bank AT offers FinanceAds.
- Networks: only Wallester offers Daisycon, Tradetracker.
- Wallester is available in 4 more countries.
- Pricing model: only Wallester offers CPL, Revshare, Hybrid.
- Features: only TF Bank AT offers Referral.
- Region: only TF Bank AT offers Single country.
- Region: only Wallester offers Europe.
Our verdict on each
TF Bank AT
TF Bank AT is a focused, single-market offer for publishers with card banking or lending audiences, paying a flat CPA on the card activation. The 30 day window matches the common finance figure, so volume depends on how well your traffic fits single country.
Wallester
Wallester suits publishers with European business and finance audiences who can convert intent into funded accounts, since the offer is a two-step PPL of EUR 100 + EUR 300 2-step PPL on a 60 window. The banking vertical keeps the audience narrow, so volume comes from Europe, not from the wider web.
Licences and countries
| Country | TF Bank AT | Wallester |
|---|---|---|
| Region | Single country | Europe |
Additional countries for TF Bank AT: 1. Additional countries for Wallester: 5.
Side by side, item by item
| Pricing model | TF Bank AT | Wallester |
|---|---|---|
| CPA | Yes | Yes |
| CPL | No | Yes |
| Revshare | No | Yes |
| Hybrid | No | Yes |
Winner by area
- Wallester edges TF Bank AT on cost, 1 facts to 0.
- Wallester is ahead on offer, winning 2 of 2 facts.
Sources behind this comparison
TF Bank AT
- tfbank.at: 7 facts, checked September 26, 2026
Wallester
- wallester.com: 7 facts, checked September 26, 2026
- all-affiliates.com: 2 facts, checked September 26, 2026
- fintechmagazine.com: 2 facts, checked September 26, 2026
- rigacomm.com: 1 fact, checked September 26, 2026
How they place
| Ranking | TF Bank AT | Wallester |
|---|---|---|
| Finance affiliate programs | 67 of 425 | 14 of 425 |
| Banking and fintech programs | 15 of 86 | 3 of 86 |
Every fact side by side
| Fact | TF Bank AT | Wallester |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | CPA | CPA, CPL, Revshare, HybridCovers more |
| Features | Direct, ReferralCovers more | Direct |
| Region | Single country | Europe |
| Legal entity | Avarda Bank AB | Wallester AS |
| Headquarters | Sweden | Estonia |
| Founded | Not confirmed | 2016 |
| Support channels | Email, Phone, Help centre | Not confirmed |
Where each stands against the rest
| Fact | TF Bank AT | Wallester | Median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cookie window | 30 daysat the median | 60 dayshighest quarter | 30 days |
| Payout per sale or signup | €50at the median | €200highest quarter | €50 |
Median across 146 listed affiliate programs.
Pros and cons
TF Bank AT
Pros
- A clear, easy to price action: 50 EUR per activated card on an activated card, with the model listed as cpa.
- The 30 day window matches the finance median of 30, so the attribution window is not the limiting factor here.
- Both a direct and a referral route are listed in direct and referral, which lets you run paid placements and word of mouth style promotion side by side.
Cons
- There is no recurring commission, so a subscriber who stays for years pays the same as a sign up that lapses after the first month.
- single country coverage means the offer pays only in a single market, and 52.5% shows how common that limit is across the category.
- financeAds lists one network only, so there is no second route to the same offer if your approval terms change.
Wallester
Pros
- Two-step PPL of EUR 100 + EUR 300 2-step PPL pays on a qualified lead that becomes a funded account.
- cpa, cpl and revshare gives publishers a choice of models rather than a single payout type.
- Recurring commission is on, so an account that keeps its balance keeps paying.
Cons
- europe caps the audience, so North American traffic has little to convert here.
- banking is narrow, which limits the number of pages a publisher can write.
- The programme pays on a two-step PPL under EUR 100 + EUR 300 2-step PPL, so a lead that stalls before funding pays nothing.
Who each suits
TF Bank AT
Who it suits
- Publishers whose audience already applies for cards or short term credit in a single market.
- Media buyers who can pass a 30 day window to their optimisation and price a flat 50 EUR per activated card per activation.
- Sites with room for both a direct offer and a referral mention, since direct and referral covers both.
Who should look elsewhere
- Publishers who need lifetime value from a finance signup, since there is no recurring commission here.
- Anyone chasing a broad, multi country card offer, because single country narrows it to a single market.
- Publishers who want a revenue share or a percentage model, since the model is cpa and Admitad pays a percentage per sale instead.
Wallester
Who it suits
- Publishers running finance or small business content for European readers
- Sites with an audience that already trusts banking and fintech brands
- Network affiliates who want a second, recurring option alongside a per-approval offer
Who should look elsewhere
- Publishers chasing North American audiences, since the programme runs in europe
- Anyone wanting a wide vertical mix, because the offer sits in banking only
- Publishors who need long decision windows, since the window is 60 days
Country by country
| Country | TF Bank AT | Wallester |
|---|---|---|
| Austria | Yes | No |
| France | No | Yes |
| Germany | No | Yes |
| Spain | No | Yes |
| United Kingdom | No | Yes |
| United States | No | Yes |
Questions about each
TF Bank AT
What does TF Bank AT pay per activated card?+
The programme pays 50 EUR per activated card, and the commission model is cpa. That is a flat fee for a single event rather than a share of what the customer goes on to spend or repay. Budget around one payment per activated card, not per month of account life.
How long is the cookie window?+
The attribution window is 30 days, which is the same as the finance median of 30. Across the site the typical window runs from 30 to 60, so this sits in the ordinary middle range rather than at either extreme.
Wallester
How much does Wallester pay per approved account?+
The per-approval payout is €200, paid under a two-step PPL of EUR 100 + EUR 300 2-step PPL. A lead that never turns into a funded account earns nothing, so lead quality matters more than lead volume here. The model list is cpa, cpl and revshare.
How long is the cookie window?+
The window runs 60 days. That is longer than the finance median of 30 days, so a reader who takes a fortnight to open a business account can still be credited. It is shorter than the 90 day ceiling seen in the banking and fintech group.