Updated September 28, 2026 · AffCue Editorial Team
ING vs Singleflirt
Facts checked September 26, 2026.
Facts checked September 26, 2026.
Where ING and Singleflirt differ
| Compare |  ING | Singleflirt ReviewSee alternativesSee alternatives |
|---|---|---|
| Commission terms | EUR 46.00 CPL per lead | $6.71 SOI per signup |
| Networks | FinanceAds | CrakRevenue |
| Payout per sale or signup | €46 | $6.71 |
| Verticals | Banking | Adult dating |
| Cookie window | 60 days | Not confirmed |
Same on both: Recurring commission (No).
We earn a commission when you sign up through links on this site. Partner status can affect where a brand appears in our rankings.
Key differences
- Networks: only ING offers FinanceAds.
- Networks: only Singleflirt offers CrakRevenue.
- Pricing model: only ING offers CPL.
- Pricing model: only Singleflirt offers CPA.
- Verticals: only ING offers Banking.
- Verticals: only Singleflirt offers Adult dating.
Our verdict on each
ING
ING pays a set CPL for its Conto Arancio offer, so publishers who can deliver a steady flow of qualified banking leads in a single market can count on predictable income. The trade-off is the shape: no recurring commission, a single network, and a window of 60 days.
Singleflirt
Singleflirt pays $6.71 SOI per signup for a confirmed signup and runs through CrakRevenue, which suits publishers with adult dating traffic who want a simple CPA. The trade-off is narrow scope: the programme pays at signup only, covers only the adult dating niche, and carries no recurring cut.
Licences and countries
| Country | ING | Singleflirt |
|---|---|---|
| Region | Single country | Not confirmed |
What we checked
ING
- financeads.com: 8 facts, checked September 26, 2026
- en.wikipedia.org: 2 facts, checked September 26, 2026
- ing.com: 1 fact, checked September 26, 2026
Singleflirt
- affbank.com: 6 facts, checked September 26, 2026
Every fact side by side
| Fact | ING | Singleflirt |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | CPL | CPA |
| Region | Single country | Not confirmed |
| Legal entity | ING Groep N.V. | Not confirmed |
| Headquarters | Netherlands | Not confirmed |
| Founded | 1991 | Not confirmed |
Where each stands against the rest
| Fact | ING | Singleflirt | Median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cookie window | 60 dayshighest quarter | Not confirmed | 30 days |
Median across 147 listed affiliate programs.
Pros and cons
ING
Pros
- A fixed rate of EUR 46.00 CPL per lead makes lead value easy to forecast.
- A 60 day window gives comparison style banking content room to convert.
- Banking focus (banking) slots straight into sites already writing about current accounts.
Cons
- Recurring commission is not offered, so an approved lead pays once and nothing follows.
- Only single country traffic earns, so an international audience converts at a lower rate.
- The 60 day window ranks 23 of 129 on cookie length.
Singleflirt
Pros
- The payout is simple to forecast at $6.71 SOI per signup under a cpa model.
- A single network, CrakRevenue, keeps tracking and reporting in the same place.
- The niche is defined as adult dating, which keeps audience and offer message aligned.
Cons
- Recurring commission: no, so a subscriber is worth the same at signup as months later.
- A single niche, adult dating, with nothing else in the catalogue to pair it with.
- A flat rate leaves no room for tiering: $6.71 SOI per signup is identical for every signup.
Who each suits
ING
Who it suits
- Publishers with steady banking lead volume in a single market who can hit a known CPL.
- Sites that write current account comparisons, where a 60 day window is enough to convert.
- Publishers already inside financeAds who want a finance programme to add to an existing slate.
Who should look elsewhere
- Publishers who need several payout triggers: Mintos pays Hybrid lead and CPA commission rather than a flat CPL.
- Anyone chasing a share of sales: Admitad pays 5% per sale on a different basis.
- Publishers after a registration bonus: Qonto pays CPA per registration plus KYB bonus and adds a bonus for verified businesses.
Singleflirt
Who it suits
- Publishers whose traffic already converts in the adult dating niche
- Networks and media buyers who prefer a single, easy to explain CPA payout
- Anyone running a dating offer page, since the rate $6.71 SOI per signup needs no tier tracking
Who should look elsewhere
- Nemora AI, whose 50% on every sale for life pays on every sale rather than at signup only
- MetArt Network, on 50% recurring revenue share, for publishers who want their cut to repeat
Country by country
| Country | ING | Singleflirt |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | Yes | No |
Questions about each
ING
What does the ING programme pay for a lead?+
ING pays EUR 46.00 CPL per lead on the current account offer, and cpl shows the model is CPL. Payment attaches to the lead rather than to any later account activity, so the rate is easy to plan around but capped at a single payout per lead.
How long is the cookie window on ING leads?+
The window runs 60 days from the click. On the site that is a middle of the pack figure: the median across listed programmes is 30 days and the upper quartile 60 days, so a longer comparison style article should still convert inside the ING window.
Singleflirt
How much does Singleflirt pay for a signup?+
Singleflirt pays $6.71 SOI per signup, listed as a $6.71 payout on a cpa basis. Payment is triggered by the signup itself rather than a later purchase, so a subscriber who signs up and never returns counts the same as a subscriber who stays.
What kind of commission model does Singleflirt use?+
The model is cpa, a cost per action payout of $6.71 SOI per signup per signup. There is no revenue share element and no recurring payment, so earnings depend on the volume of new signups rather than on what subscribers spend afterwards.