Updated September 28, 2026 · AffCue Editorial Team

Hannoversche vs LYNX B.V. Germany Branch

Hannoversche scores 9.4 and LYNX B.V. Germany Branch 9.7 out of 10. Compare their differences and shared features below.

Hannoversche

Facts checked September 26, 2026.

LYNX B.V. Germany Branch

Facts checked September 26, 2026.

Hannoversche vs LYNX B.V. Germany Branch: the differences

Hannoversche vs LYNX B.V. Germany Branch
Compare
HannoverscheHannoversche
ReviewSee alternativesSee alternatives
LYNX B.V. Germany BranchLYNX B.V. Germany Branch
ReviewSee alternativesSee alternatives
Commission termsup to 225 EUR per saleUp to 160 EUR per lead
NetworksTelljaAwin, FinanceAds
Payout per sale or signup€225Higher€160
VerticalsInsuranceInvesting
Recurring commissionNoNot confirmed
Payout methodsBank transfer, Paypal, Gift cardNot confirmed

We earn a commission when you sign up through links on this site. Partner status can affect where a brand appears in our rankings.

Key differences

  • Payout per sale or signup is higher at Hannoversche: €225 vs €160.
  • Networks: only Hannoversche offers Tellja.
  • Networks: only LYNX B.V. Germany Branch offers Awin, FinanceAds.
  • LYNX B.V. Germany Branch is available in 1 more country.
  • Pricing model: only LYNX B.V. Germany Branch offers CPL.
  • Region: only Hannoversche offers Single country.
  • Region: only LYNX B.V. Germany Branch offers Europe.
  • Verticals: only Hannoversche offers Insurance.
  • Verticals: only LYNX B.V. Germany Branch offers Investing.

Our verdict on each

Hannoversche

Hannoversche runs a German referral scheme that pays a flat CPA of up to 225 EUR per sale, with a cost score of 8.8. It suits publishers whose traffic already sits in Germany and who want a plain payout structure rather than a broad offer set.

Read the full Hannoversche review

LYNX B.V. Germany Branch

LYNX B.V. Germany Branch pays Up to 160 EUR per lead to publishers already selling brokerage signups in europe. The programme is a specialist pick: cpa and cpl payout, Awin and financeAds access, and a investing focus that keeps messaging tight, with fewer verticals to promote than broader finance programmes.

Read the full LYNX B.V. Germany Branch review

Earnings on 10 sales of 100

Hannoversche

€2,250

10 × €225

LYNX B.V. Germany Branch

€1,600

10 × €160

Hannoversche comes out €650 ahead.

Worked out from the stated prices and rates; your own total depends on how you use it. Facts checked September 26, 2026.

Positions in our rankings

Hannoversche vs LYNX B.V. Germany Branch
RankingHannoverscheLYNX B.V. Germany Branch
Finance affiliate programs15 of 4254 of 425

Availability and regulation

Hannoversche vs LYNX B.V. Germany Branch
CountryHannoverscheLYNX B.V. Germany Branch
RegionSingle countryEurope

Available in 1 country for both. Additional countries for LYNX B.V. Germany Branch: 1.

Also worth a look

Qonto has payout per sale or signup at €200 to €500, against €225 for Hannoversche and €160 for LYNX B.V. Germany Branch.

Qonto review

Every fact side by side

Hannoversche vs LYNX B.V. Germany Branch
FactHannoverscheLYNX B.V. Germany Branch
Pricing modelCPACPA, CPLCovers more
FeaturesReferralNot confirmed
RegionSingle countryEurope
Legal entityHannoversche Lebensversicherung AGNot confirmed
HeadquartersGermanyNot confirmed
Founded1875Not confirmed
Support channelsPhone, EmailNot confirmed

Where each stands against the rest

Hannoversche vs LYNX B.V. Germany Branch
FactHannoverscheLYNX B.V. Germany BranchMedian
Payout per sale or signup€225highest quarter€160highest quarter€50

Median across 65 listed affiliate programs.

Pros and cons

Hannoversche

Pros

  • The rate is a flat cost per action of up to 225 EUR per sale, so what a converted referral earns can be budgeted before you write the content.
  • Money leaves through bank transfer, paypal and gift card, so a publisher is not tied to a single settlement route.
  • The scheme runs on Tellja, which keeps tracking inside a network you can report from alongside your other programmes.

Cons

  • Recurring commission is not offered, so a policy that stays in force produces nothing after the sale and each referral starts from scratch.
  • The scheme is a single market offer, so only German readers convert, and 79.4% of insurance programmes are limited the same way.
  • Support runs on phone and email, with no live chat listed for questions that arrive mid campaign.

LYNX B.V. Germany Branch

Pros

  • Pays Up to 160 EUR per lead for a qualified brokerage lead, with no need to chase a share of trading revenue.
  • Runs on Awin and financeAds, so an existing network account is enough to start.
  • Focused on investing, which keeps reader intent and the offer lined up.

Cons

  • Volume dependent, since cpa and cpl earnings grow with lead numbers rather than account size.
  • Region is europe, so publishers with mainly North American or Asian traffic get little from it.
  • A single vertical, investing, means the same content cannot feed several finance offers at once.

Who each suits

Hannoversche

Who it suits

  • Publishers with a German insurance readership who can recommend a specific provider and see the referral through to a policy.
  • Anyone who values a predictable flat bounty over a share of revenue, which is the shape Mintos (Hybrid lead and CPA commission) and Admitad (5% per sale) are built around.

Who should look elsewhere

  • Publishers chasing renewals, since recurring commission is not offered here while Mintos pays Hybrid lead and CPA commission across a wider range of finance signups.
  • Anyone wanting a share of each sale rather than a flat fee, where Admitad runs 5% per sale.
  • Sites whose readers sit outside Germany, since the offer covers a single market and a business banking audience fits Qonto (CPA per registration plus KYB bonus) better.

LYNX B.V. Germany Branch

Who it suits

  • Sites serving europe traffic that already covers brokerage and trading topics.
  • Publishers who want a per lead payout of Up to 160 EUR per lead and can work inside Awin and financeAds.
  • Writers whose readers are ready to open an investing account, since the offer is investing.

Who should look elsewhere

  • Mintos, whose Hybrid lead and CPA commission balances a lead payment with CPA differently.
  • Qonto, whose CPA per registration plus KYB bonus rewards registrations and a KYB bonus rather than brokerage signups.
  • Admitad, whose 5% per sale suits publishers who prefer a share of each sale to Up to 160 EUR per lead per lead.

Country by country

Hannoversche vs LYNX B.V. Germany Branch
CountryHannoverscheLYNX B.V. Germany Branch
AustriaNoYes
GermanyYesYes

Questions about each

Hannoversche

How much does a referral pay?+

The stated rate is up to 225 EUR per sale, and the model is cost per action (cpa), so a payout depends on a completed sale rather than on traffic volume. Plan your earnings per converted referral, not per click or per lead, because nothing is due until the sale completes.

Is there recurring commission?+

There is not. Recurring commission is listed as unavailable, which means an insurer that keeps a policy in force pays nothing further after the sale. Earnings reset with each new referral at up to 225 EUR per sale, so publishers who prefer lifetime value over a single bounty should look at a programme that pays on renewals.

LYNX B.V. Germany Branch

How much does LYNX B.V. Germany Branch pay?+

The stated rate is Up to 160 EUR per lead, which is the figure the programme advertises for a qualified brokerage lead. Payment attaches to the account opening rather than to trading activity, so the earning comes from the signup itself. Treat the top of that range as a ceiling rather than a guaranteed amount.

What commission model does the programme use?+

The model is cpa and cpl, so a publisher is paid on a cost per acquisition or cost per lead basis. Neither model pays a share of the trading fees a reader generates, which sets it apart from revenue share deals. Earnings therefore depend directly on how many qualified accounts you send.

LYNX B.V. Germany Branch

LYNX B.V. Germany Branch

Higher score in this comparison

See alternatives