Updated September 28, 2026 · AffCue Editorial Team
bunq vs Wallester
Where bunq and Wallester differ
| Compare |  bunq |  Wallester |
|---|---|---|
| Commission terms | Up to 60 EUR per verified signup | EUR 100 + EUR 300 2-step PPL |
| Cookie window | 30 days | 60 daysHigher |
| Networks | Everflow, FinanceAds | Daisycon, Tradetracker |
| Recurring commission | No | YesHas it |
| Payout per sale or signup | €60 | €200Higher |
Same on both: Verticals (Banking).
We earn a commission when you sign up through links on this site. Partner status can affect where a brand appears in our rankings.
Key differences
- Cookie window is higher at Wallester: 60 days vs 30 days.
- Recurring commission: only Wallester.
- Payout per sale or signup is higher at Wallester: €200 vs €60.
- Networks: only bunq offers Everflow, FinanceAds.
- Networks: only Wallester offers Daisycon, Tradetracker.
- Founded is lower at bunq: 2012 vs 2016.
- Pricing model: only Wallester offers CPL, Revshare, Hybrid.
Our verdict on each
bunq
bunq is a banking program for publishers with European audiences, paying Up to 60 EUR per verified signup on a CPA model with a 30 day window. It fits partners who prefer a payout per verified signup over revenue share, though no recurring commission caps the lifetime value of each referral.
Wallester
Wallester suits publishers with European business and finance audiences who can convert intent into funded accounts, since the offer is a two-step PPL of EUR 100 + EUR 300 2-step PPL on a 60 window. The banking vertical keeps the audience narrow, so volume comes from Europe, not from the wider web.
Availability and regulation
| Country | bunq | Wallester |
|---|---|---|
| Region | Europe | Europe |
Feature by feature
| Pricing model | bunq | Wallester |
|---|---|---|
| CPA | Yes | Yes |
| CPL | No | Yes |
| Revshare | No | Yes |
| Hybrid | No | Yes |
If neither fits
Hannoversche has payout per sale or signup at €225, against €60 for bunq and €200 for Wallester.
Hannoversche reviewWhere these facts come from
bunq
- bunq.com: 7 facts, checked September 26, 2026
- en.wikipedia.org: 3 facts, checked September 26, 2026
- financeads.com: 3 facts, checked September 26, 2026
Wallester
- wallester.com: 7 facts, checked September 26, 2026
- all-affiliates.com: 2 facts, checked September 26, 2026
- fintechmagazine.com: 2 facts, checked September 26, 2026
- rigacomm.com: 1 fact, checked September 26, 2026
How they place
| Ranking | bunq | Wallester |
|---|---|---|
| Finance affiliate programs | 38 of 425 | 14 of 425 |
| Banking and fintech programs | 8 of 86 | 3 of 86 |
Every fact side by side
| Fact | bunq | Wallester |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | CPA | CPA, CPL, Revshare, HybridCovers more |
| Features | Direct | Direct |
| Region | Europe | Europe |
| Legal entity | bunq B.V. | Wallester AS |
| Headquarters | Netherlands | Estonia |
| Founded | 2012Lower | 2016 |
| Support channels | Email, Chat, Help centre | Not confirmed |
Where each stands against the rest
| Fact | bunq | Wallester | Median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cookie window | 30 daysat the median | 60 dayshighest quarter | 30 days |
| Payout per sale or signup | €60above the median | €200highest quarter | €50 |
Median across 146 listed affiliate programs.
Pros and cons
bunq
Pros
- A published payout of Up to 60 EUR per verified signup, so a partner can forecast earnings per verified signup without waiting on a later sales total.
- The 30 day window matches the 30 day median across programs here, so a standard account opening funnel fits inside it without special tracking.
- Reach in europe through direct availability, which suits publishers with a European banking readership rather than global traffic.
Cons
- Recurring commission is no, so the payout ends at conversion with nothing afterwards; Qonto runs CPA per registration plus KYB bonus and adds a bonus on top of its registration payout.
- Up to 60 EUR per verified signup sets the maximum for a verified signup, so real earnings per referral can sit below the headline figure.
- A 30 day window places bunq at 39 of 129 brands ranked on cookie length here, behind the 90 day longest window in banking and fintech.
Wallester
Pros
- Two-step PPL of EUR 100 + EUR 300 2-step PPL pays on a qualified lead that becomes a funded account.
- cpa, cpl and revshare gives publishers a choice of models rather than a single payout type.
- Recurring commission is on, so an account that keeps its balance keeps paying.
Cons
- europe caps the audience, so North American traffic has little to convert here.
- banking is narrow, which limits the number of pages a publisher can write.
- The programme pays on a two-step PPL under EUR 100 + EUR 300 2-step PPL, so a lead that stalls before funding pays nothing.
Who each suits
bunq
Who it suits
- Publishers with a European readership in banking who can send readers into an account opening and verification flow, since the program is scoped to europe.
- Partners who prefer a predictable CPA line item: Up to 60 EUR per verified signup per verified signup, credited inside a 30 day window.
- Sites that want direct access to the brand alongside network options, since the program is listed as direct and works through Everflow and financeAds.
Who should look elsewhere
- Publishers chasing lead volume: Mintos runs Hybrid lead and CPA commission, so it pays for leads as well as completed accounts.
- Anyone wanting a sales based payout that keeps earning after the referral: Admitad pays 5% per sale, which suits ecommerce traffic rather than bank account reviews.
- Publishers whose traffic sits outside europe, since the program is recorded for Europe and no other market is listed.
Wallester
Who it suits
- Publishers running finance or small business content for European readers
- Sites with an audience that already trusts banking and fintech brands
- Network affiliates who want a second, recurring option alongside a per-approval offer
Who should look elsewhere
- Publishers chasing North American audiences, since the programme runs in europe
- Anyone wanting a wide vertical mix, because the offer sits in banking only
- Publishors who need long decision windows, since the window is 60 days
Country by country
| Country | bunq | Wallester |
|---|---|---|
| France | No | Yes |
| Germany | No | Yes |
| Spain | No | Yes |
| United Kingdom | No | Yes |
| United States | No | Yes |
Questions about each
bunq
How much does bunq pay for a referred signup?+
The published rate is Up to 60 EUR per verified signup, tied to a signup that completes verification, and the CPA amount behind that figure is €60. The model is CPA, so the payout attaches to the conversion itself rather than to any later balance or spend the account makes. The stated figure is a ceiling, so individual conversions can pay less than the headline rate.
How long is the cookie window?+
The window is 30 days, which is the standard length across most programs here: the median listed is 30 days and the upper quartile 60 days. On cookie length bunq ranks 39 of 129 brands, so a referral that converts after the window closes earns nothing for the publisher.
Wallester
How much does Wallester pay per approved account?+
The per-approval payout is €200, paid under a two-step PPL of EUR 100 + EUR 300 2-step PPL. A lead that never turns into a funded account earns nothing, so lead quality matters more than lead volume here. The model list is cpa, cpl and revshare.
How long is the cookie window?+
The window runs 60 days. That is longer than the finance median of 30 days, so a reader who takes a fortnight to open a business account can still be credited. It is shorter than the 90 day ceiling seen in the banking and fintech group.