Top investing and trading programs compared

About Top investing and trading programs compared

Broker and platform programs share one job: turn a reader who opens a trading account, funds a portfolio or takes a loan into a paying partner. This ranking of 86 brands covers the investing and trading side only, from brokerage signups to revenue share on funded accounts. What separates them is the trade-off between what one conversion is worth and how long you hold on to that reader. Some pay a flat fee per funded trader on a long cookie, others pay a slice of revenue that keeps producing, and a few blend the two. A flat fee is easy to forecast. Revenue share and recurring commission reward a publisher who stays with one account for years. Region matters just as much: a cookie only pays if the reader can act on it. The ranking weighs the model, the cookie window, the payout rhythm and the markets each program takes.

How we picked

Every program here is scored on published terms, not on signups or revenue claims. Cost carries 40% of the score and covers what a conversion is worth, the commission model and the length of the cookie. Offer carries 40% and looks at the verticals a program covers, the features it offers such as direct or referral links, and the regions it accepts. Trust carries 20% and reflects the legal entity, the support channels a publisher can reach and the payout schedule. Terms come from each program's own partner pages, with cookie windows cross checked against independent program directories where a brand does not publish one. The median cookie across these programs is 45, and CPA is the dominant model at 90.9%. Partner programs are placed ahead of the rest because they can be searched and joined directly, so 7 of the 86 programs here sit in that group. Everything else follows on score.

Our top picks

1. 1. InstaForex

   InstaForex is in this ranking for the trading volume angle. Up to $20 per market lot sits alongside a CPA of $2,000, and the model covers CPA, CPL and revenue share, so a partner can be paid for a lead, a signup or a funded account. Recurring commission is a yes, which suits a publisher writing about lot sizes and trade volumes over time. The program takes a global audience, so currency and time zone of traffic are not limits. Compared with AMarkets above, which pays on a daily rhythm, InstaForex pays per lot, so the amount depends on how much the referred trader trades rather than on the account being funded.

   • Commission terms: Up to $20 per market lot
   • Recurring commission: Yes
   • Payout per sale or signup: $2,000

   Pros

   • Several payout models run side by side, including cost per action, cost per lead and revenue share (cpa, cpl and revshare).
   • Recurring commission is part of the deal, so a referred trader can keep paying after the first deposits.
   • Volume pay of Up to $20 per market lot rewards readers who trade rather than merely register.
   • A direct, global programme (direct) keeps you working with the brand rather than through a network in between.

   Cons

   • The headline Up to $20 per market lot scales with trading volume, so readers who register without trading bring you little.
   • Coverage sits in the investing vertical (investing), so it fits trading content rather than wider finance topics.

2. 5. BlackBull Partners

   BlackBull Partners closes this ranking on the longest cookie and a recurring tail. Its window runs 365 days, with CPA up to $1,000 per client and a CPA of $1,000. Recurring commission is a yes, so a funded client keeps paying, and the payout schedule is Monthly. Support runs on email, and the program is reached through Cellxpert, the partner network also listed higher in this ranking. Compared with InstaForex above, BlackBull keeps a reader attributed for far longer, which helps publishers whose audience takes a while to move money.

   • Commission terms: CPA up to $1,000 per client
   • Cookie window: 365 days
   • Networks: Cellxpert

   Pros

   • Commission of CPA up to $1,000 per client is among the stronger per-client figures in the directory
   • A cookie window of 365 days puts the programme at the top of 129 brands on that measure
   • Recurring commission means an approved client can keep paying out afterwards
   • Models cover cpa, cpl and revshare, so leads and revenue can each be monetised
   • Payouts run Monthly, and the programme runs in global

   Cons

   • Support runs on email only, so a publisher with a live question waits for a reply
   • The programme covers investing alone, which narrows what a mixed-niche site can promote
   • Payouts are Monthly, so earnings wait longer than a weekly schedule
   • A single network, Cellxpert, means tracking is not spread across several partners

3. 7. Mintos: best for top-pick

   Mintos sits in this ranking on two things readers of lending and investing sites weigh: Hybrid lead and CPA commission, and a cookie of 90 days, well above the 45 median here. A window that long suits content people bookmark and return to, such as rate tables and loan comparisons. The program runs on Impact, and support runs on email, help centre and community. Recurring commission is a no, so earnings rest on funded accounts rather than on what follows. Compared with FXTM next, which pays a flat fee per trader on 30 days, Mintos fits research heavy traffic better.

   • Commission terms: Hybrid lead and CPA commission
   • Cookie window: 90 days
   • Networks: Impact

   Pros

   • Cookie window of 90 days sits well past the 30 day median across the programmes listed here
   • Pays on Hybrid lead and CPA commission, so leads and signups both earn
   • Runs on the Impact network, a familiar route for established finance publishers
   • Covers the investing and lending verticals, so investing and lending content can share one programme
   • Backed by AS Mintos Marketplace, registered in LV

   Cons

   • A hybrid Hybrid lead and CPA commission model means approval rules sit with Mintos, so tracking is not fully under the publisher's control
   • Coverage is europe only, which limits reach next to a global programme
   • Support runs on email, help centre and community only, with no phone or live chat listed for account questions
   • Referral is the only entry in its feature set (referral), so a direct deal is not among the options to compare it with

What to look for

The model behind the fee

Most programs in this category pay on a CPA basis, 90.9%, while 36.4% add revenue share and 10.9% a blended structure. A flat fee is easy to forecast, while a share grows with the volume the account produces. Pick the model that matches your traffic before you read the headline rate.

How long the cookie lasts

The median window here is 45, with a lower quartile of 30 and an upper quartile of 60. Trading readers take their time, so a longer window suits editorial content, though it also credits signups you would not have earned.

Recurring pay

30.3% of the programs in this category pay a recurring commission and 69.7% pay once. Recurring pay rewards an audience that keeps its account open, and it is the main reason a smaller headline fee can still be worth more over a year.

Where the program runs

37.3% accept traffic from anywhere, 33.3% stay in Europe, and 27.5% serve a single market. A cookie only pays when the reader can open an account, so audience geography can matter as much as the fee.

Support for the publisher

70.4% of the programs can be reached by email and 59.3% run a help centre, while 20.4% offer live chat. Email is the common part, and a direct line for tracking queries saves time.

What the account covers

100% cover investing and 16.3% add crypto, with 3.5% also reaching gambling. An account covering two verticals lets one review carry two pieces of content. Every program in this ranking is an investing or trading offer.

Frequently asked questions

Top investing and trading programs compared by country

• France
• Germany
• Greece
• Italy
• Spain
• United Kingdom
• United States

The data behind this ranking

All data and the CSV