Updated September 29, 2026 · AffCue Editorial Team
Oxylabs vs PaapiPlugin
Facts checked September 26, 2026.
Facts checked September 28, 2026.
Where Oxylabs and PaapiPlugin differ
| Compare |  Oxylabs |  PaapiPlugin |
|---|---|---|
| Commission terms | 50% per sale up to $2000 | 50% commission per sale |
| Networks | HasOffers (TUNE) | Awin |
| Payout frequency | monthly | monthly via AWIN |
| Verticals | Security, Hosting | Hosting, Retail |
| Cookie window | Not confirmed | 30 days |
| Recurring commission | No | Not confirmed |
| Payout threshold | $25 | Not confirmed |
| Payout per sale or signup | $2,000 | Not confirmed |
Same on both: Commission (%) (50%).
We earn a commission when you sign up through links on this site. Partner status can affect where a brand appears in our rankings.
Key differences
- Support channels: only PaapiPlugin offers Help centre, Community.
- Networks: only Oxylabs offers HasOffers (TUNE).
- Networks: only PaapiPlugin offers Awin.
- Pricing model: only Oxylabs offers CPA.
- Pricing model: only PaapiPlugin offers CPS.
- Verticals: only Oxylabs offers Security.
- Verticals: only PaapiPlugin offers Retail.
Our verdict on each
Oxylabs
Oxylabs suits publishers who can land a few high value buyers rather than a long tail of small accounts. The programme pays 50% per sale up to $2000 on a cpa model, so a single conversion carries the month and lead volume is not the lever that matters here.
PaapiPlugin
PaapiPlugin suits publishers covering hosting or retail topics who value a clearly stated per sale commission, with the offer listed as 50% commission per sale. The trade off is a 30 attribution window within a CPS structure CPS, alongside payouts scheduled monthly via AWIN monthly via AWIN.
Where each is licensed and available
| Country | Oxylabs | PaapiPlugin |
|---|---|---|
| Region | Global | Not confirmed |
Earnings on 10 sales of 100
Oxylabs
500
50% of 1,000
PaapiPlugin
500
50% of 1,000
Both come to the same total.
Worked out from the stated prices and rates; your own total depends on how you use it. Facts checked September 28, 2026.
How they place
| Ranking | Oxylabs | PaapiPlugin |
|---|---|---|
| Software and SaaS programs | 11 of 40 | 7 of 40 |
| Web hosting programs | 5 of 15 | 4 of 15 |
Where these facts come from
Oxylabs
- oxylabs.io: 10 facts, checked September 26, 2026
- oxylabs.hasoffers.com: 3 facts, checked September 26, 2026
PaapiPlugin
- paapiplugin.com: 9 facts, checked September 28, 2026
Every fact side by side
| Fact | Oxylabs | PaapiPlugin |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | CPA | CPS |
| Features | Direct | Direct |
| Region | Global | Not confirmed |
| Founded | 2015 | Not confirmed |
| Support channels | Email, Help centre, CommunityCovers more |
Where each stands against the rest
| Fact | Oxylabs | PaapiPlugin | Median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cookie window | Not confirmed | 30 daysat the median | 30 days |
| Payout threshold | $25below the median | Not confirmed | $50 |
| Commission (%) | 50%highest quarter | 50%highest quarter | 12% |
| Payout per sale or signup | $2,000highest quarter | Not confirmed | $160 |
Median across 167 listed affiliate programs.
Pros and cons
Oxylabs
Pros
- Terms of 50% per sale up to $2000 put a hard ceiling on a sale, so a small number of conversions can carry a full cycle.
- A cpa payout at 50% is easier to model than Up to 100% first-year sales from the monday affiliate programme.
- The programme runs on HasOffers (TUNE), so tracking and payouts sit with a network publishers already use.
Cons
- Recurring commission is no, so a sale pays once: 25-30% recurring for 12 months at Jasper and 25% to 35% recurring for 12 months at FirstPromoter keep paying on the same account.
- Support runs on email only, so tracking questions travel by email between campaigns.
- Commission under the $25 threshold waits for a cycle to close, so cash flow matters more here than on a lower bar programme.
PaapiPlugin
Pros
- The commission is stated plainly as 50% commission per sale, making the per sale basis clear for publishers comparing sales based affiliate offers.
- A 30 cookie window gives publishers a defined attribution period that matches the broad site median of 30.
- Monthly payouts via AWIN are specified monthly via AWIN, and AWIN is listed as the programme network awin for consolidated tracking.
Cons
- The 30 cookie window matches the site median of 30, so it does not exceed that broad benchmark for attribution length.
- The CPS model ties commission to completed sales, which may suit sales focused content less well for publishers focused on leads rather than purchases CPS.
- Payments are scheduled monthly via AWIN monthly via AWIN, a cadence to weigh carefully if cash flow timing matters for publisher planning.
Who each suits
Oxylabs
Who it suits
- Publishers with technical or developer audiences, since the verticals are security and hosting.
- Networks and media buyers already inside HasOffers (TUNE), which is the listed payout route.
- Anyone modelling earnings on a single conversion, because 50% per sale up to $2000 makes a capped per sale payment the whole calculation.
Who should look elsewhere
- Publishers chasing recurring revenue, who earn more from 25-30% recurring for 12 months at Jasper or 25% to 35% recurring for 12 months at FirstPromoter.
- Publishers who need live chat or phone answers, since support runs on email.
- Publishers spreading effort across many small accounts, since 50% per sale up to $2000 rewards fewer, larger conversions.
PaapiPlugin
Who it suits
- Hosting publishers who want a sale based offer with clearly stated terms hosting and retail 50% commission per sale.
- Retail publishers comparing affiliate programs with a defined cookie period for shopping intent traffic hosting and retail 30.
- Publishers who prefer a named network and stated monthly payment cadence for planning and reporting awin monthly via AWIN.
Who should look elsewhere
- Publishers seeking an offer explicitly described as ongoing commissions may prefer Viennaweb partner program, which lists Ongoing commissions, Silver Gold Platinum.
- Publishers comparing offers by sales terms tied to an initial period may prefer Monday.com Affiliate, which lists Up to 100% first-year sales.
Questions about each
Oxylabs
What commission does the Oxylabs affiliate programme pay?+
Oxylabs pays 50% per sale up to $2000, at a commission rate of 50% on a cpa model, with the cap on a sale set at $2,000. A publisher is better served aiming a small number of high value subscriptions rather than chasing many small accounts, because the payment per conversion is what carries a month's earnings.
Is the Oxylabs programme recurring?+
Recurring commission is no, so a conversion pays once and that account contributes nothing after the first sale. Jasper at 25-30% recurring for 12 months and FirstPromoter at 25% to 35% recurring for 12 months both keep paying over the following year, which matters if the subscribers you send stick around.
PaapiPlugin
How does PaapiPlugin affiliate commission work?+
PaapiPlugin lists 50% commission per sale and identifies the model as CPS CPS. The terms describe commission tied to a completed sale, rather than a stated payment for a lead or a recurring share. Publishers can compare this structure with alternatives that describe their terms in different ways.
What is the cookie window?+
The listed cookie window is 30. This gives publishers a defined attribution period to weigh alongside commission terms, especially when comparing offers with different cookie lengths. The programme stated payment model is CPS CPS, so the offer remains framed around completed sales.