Maxda review

Maxda pays 20 EUR per registration, a fixed amount per registration rather than a share of a loan. The structure is a cpl programme, so the fee attaches to the signup itself and does not move with loan size or term. Nothing in the listed terms scales with what the borrower later borrows.

The window runs 90 from the click, which puts Maxda at 12 of 129 brands ranked on that measure. The finance group median is 30 and the lending median is 90, so the window sits at the longer end for both. A reader who takes days to compare still converts.

Recurring commission is a no. Maxda pays a single time, at 20 EUR per registration, and there is no further cut if the borrower keeps the credit with Maxda. That matches the wider pattern here, since 90% of lending programmes in the comparison set pay nothing recurring. Anyone planning around lifetime value needs a different structure.

Maxda sits on Adklick, which handles the offer link, approval and reporting. lending is the only category covered, so the whole programme is aimed at credit comparison content. A publisher already inside that network can test the offer without adding a second platform, and lenders in the same niche can be compared side by side.

The offer is a single country programme, so Maxda takes publishers and borrowers in a single market only. Single market credit offers are common here, with 71.4% of lending programmes in the comparison set scoped that way. A publisher whose traffic spans several countries should confirm the market before building pages around the offer.

Mintos pays Hybrid lead and CPA commission, so a publisher there can pick between a lead payment and a CPA. Maxda runs a cpl structure at 20 EUR per registration per registration, which is simpler to model but caps the upside on a well converting comparison page. Publishers who want a choice of bases should weigh Mintos first.

Qonto lists CPA per registration plus KYB bonus, so its payout adds a bonus on top of the registration, while Maxda's 20 EUR per registration ends at the signup. Both are close to a per registration model, so the practical difference is the bonus rather than the base. A publisher who can clear the verification steps may earn more on comparable traffic.

It depends on the base. Admitad pays 5% per sale, so its payout rises and falls with sales volume, while Maxda pays 20 EUR per registration per cpl lead whatever the loan size. A lending page that converts registrations reliably suits Maxda, while a page that sends shoppers to buy suits a sale based rate.

The overall rating is 6 out of ten, split into an offer part of 8.7 and a cost part of 3.3. The offer part reflects the 90 window and the cpl structure, while the cost part reflects a flat payment carried by a single network. Publishers can use both parts together when sizing up the offer against Mintos, Qonto and Admitad.