Updated October 16, 2026 · AffCue Editorial Team
Candy.ai vs Fanfinity
Facts checked September 26, 2026.
Fanfinity
Facts checked September 26, 2026.
Candy.ai vs Fanfinity: the differences
| Compare |  Candy.ai |  Fanfinity |
|---|---|---|
| Commission terms | 40% lifetime RevShare or $30 CPA | up to 50% commission on subscriptions |
| Commission (%) | 40% | 50%Higher |
| Networks | CrakRevenue, FirstPromoter, Everflow | Not confirmed |
| Recurring commission | Yes | Not confirmed |
| Payout frequency | NET 30 monthly | Not confirmed |
| Payout per sale or signup | $30 | Not confirmed |
Same on both: Verticals (Adult dating).
We earn a commission when you sign up through links on this site. Partner status can affect where a brand appears in our rankings.
Key differences
- Commission (%) is higher at Fanfinity: 50% vs 40%.
- Pricing model: only Candy.ai offers CPA.
- Features: only Candy.ai offers Direct.
Our verdict on each
Candy.ai
Candy.ai pays publishers in adult dating a 40% lifetime revenue share, with a per-sale option on the same offer. Recurring commission makes it a fit for anyone already sending adult dating traffic who wants earnings to keep accruing after a signup clears.
Fanfinity
Fanfinity describes AI-generated platform material and adjustable presentation settings in separate site disclosures.
Every fact side by side
| Fact | Candy.ai | Fanfinity |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | CPA, RevshareCovers more | Revshare |
| Features | Direct, ReferralCovers more | Referral |
| Region | Global | Not confirmed |
| Legal entity | Not confirmed | Nelex, LLC |
| Headquarters | Not confirmed | United States |
| Support channels | Help centre | Not confirmed |
Where each stands against the rest
| Fact | Candy.ai | Fanfinity | Median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Commission (%) | 40%highest quarter | 50%highest quarter | 12% |
| Payout per sale or signup | $30lowest quarter | Not confirmed | $160 |
Median across 179 listed affiliate programs.
Pros and cons
Candy.ai
Pros
- The model is listed as cpa and revshare, so a per-sale payment and a revenue share come from the same offer.
- Commission is recurring, so an approved player keeps paying the share.
- Payout timing is stated plainly at NET 30 monthly.
Cons
- Support runs on help centre only.
- Payouts land on NET 30 monthly, so a strong month still waits for the cycle to close.
- The per-sale figure inside 40% lifetime RevShare or $30 CPA is far smaller than the share, so the money sits in retention rather than the first conversion.
Who each suits
Candy.ai
Who it suits
- Publishers in adult dating who want a per-sale payment and a revenue share from the same offer.
- Anyone whose traffic is global, since the programme is listed as global.
- Publishers already approved on CrakRevenue, FirstPromoter and Everflow who want that approval to cover adult dating.
Who should look elsewhere
- Publishers chasing a bigger revenue share: Nemora AI lists 50% on every sale for life.
- Publishers who prefer a single recurring model: MetArt Network lists 50% recurring revenue share, while Candy.ai asks you to choose between cpa and revshare.
Fanfinity
Who it suits
- Readers comparing attributed platform descriptions.
Questions about each
Candy.ai
What commission does Candy.ai pay?+
The offer carries two options. Terms read 40% lifetime RevShare or $30 CPA, and the programme is listed as cpa and revshare, so a publisher can take the per-sale payment or a share of revenue from each player. The share runs for the life of the player rather than ending at the first payment.
Is the commission really recurring?+
Yes, recurring commission is part of the offer. Because the terms read 40% lifetime RevShare or $30 CPA, a player who signs up through your link keeps generating a share for the life of that player rather than a single payment. Expect a slower start and steadier months as your referrals accumulate.
Fanfinity
What settings does the homepage describe?+
It says users can adjust persona, voice and visual presentation.
What does Fanfinity say about how platform material is made?+
The provider describes AI as generating the material and says people do not take part in its creation.