Updated September 29, 2026 · AffCue Editorial Team
Awin vs Perform[cb]
Facts checked September 29, 2026.
Facts checked September 26, 2026.
Where Awin and Perform[cb] differ
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Commission models | CPA | CPA, CPI, CPL, CPE, CPS, CPCCovers more |
| Minimum payout | £20 | $50 |
| Payout frequency | Payments on 1st and 15th monthly | Net-15, Weekly |
| Tracking | Advanced tracking and analytics | In-house platform |
| Publishers | 1,000,000 | Not confirmed |
| Advertiser fee | £99+VAT per month + 3.5% per transaction | Not confirmed |
We earn a commission when you sign up through links on this site. Partner status can affect where a brand appears in our rankings.
Our verdict on each
Awin
Awin suits publishers and creators who want choice across retail, travel and insurance with CPA based payouts set by advertisers. With publisher reach of 1,000,000 plus regular payouts through BACS, ACH and SEPA across global markets year round.
Perform[cb]
Perform[cb] suits publishers who want many performance deal types on one account instead of a single specialist vertical. It pays on CPA, CPI and CPL deals and tracks them on In-house platform, run by Clickbooth.com LLC, a company founded in 2002 and based in the US.
Positions in our rankings
| Ranking | Awin | Perform[cb] |
|---|---|---|
| Affiliate networks | 1 of 363 | 15 of 363 |
What we checked
Awin
- awin.com: 6 facts, checked September 29, 2026
Perform[cb]
- affgate.com: 4 facts, checked September 26, 2026
- mergr.com: 2 facts, checked September 26, 2026
- epicos.com: 1 fact, checked September 26, 2026
Every fact side by side
| Fact | Awin | Perform[cb] |
|---|---|---|
| Legal entity | Not confirmed | Clickbooth.com LLC |
| Headquarters | Not confirmed | United States |
| Founded | Not confirmed | 2002 |
Affiliate programs
| Fact | Awin | Perform[cb] |
|---|---|---|
| Commission terms | Commission set by each advertiser | Not confirmed |
| Networks | Awin | Not confirmed |
| Pricing model | CPA, CPS, CPL | Not confirmed |
| Features | Direct | Not confirmed |
| Region | Global | Not confirmed |
| Payout methods | BACS, ACH, SEPA, Wire | Not confirmed |
| Verticals | Retail, Travel, Insurance | Not confirmed |
Where each stands against the rest
| Fact | Awin | Perform[cb] | Median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Publishers | 1,000,000highest quarter | Not confirmed | 30,000 |
Median across 87 listed affiliate programs.
Pros and cons
Awin
Pros
- Publisher scale of 1,000,000 signals wide adoption across global regions
- Models of CPA, CPS and CPL with Commission set by each advertiser give choice across programs
- Payouts on Payments on 1st and 15th monthly via BACS, ACH and SEPA with threshold of £20
Cons
- Commission depends on Commission set by each advertiser, so rates differ by advertiser and require program by program review
- Support runs on help centre only, which may feel limited if you prefer live help
- Advertiser fees of £99+VAT per month + 3.5% per transaction can deter smaller merchants compared with lower cost options such as INRDeals
Perform[cb]
Pros
- Payout frequency is Net-15, Weekly, giving publishers more than one schedule to plan around.
- Tracking runs on In-house platform technology, so clicks, installs and conversions are measured in one place.
- A named operator, Clickbooth.com LLC, with the business founded in 2002, gives publishers a company behind the programme.
Cons
- The $50 minimum sits above the €43.85 typical across the networks compared here, so small balances wait longer.
- The published model list is CPA, CPI and CPL, so publishers wanting revenue share would look at AWEmpire, which offers PPL, PPLR and PPS.
- Tracking runs entirely in house on In-house platform, leaving no outside tracker to reconcile reports against.
Who each suits
Awin
Who it suits
- Shopping and travel creators who value CPA choice and may otherwise consider ePN for narrower model scope
- Insurance explainers and comparison writers who want network depth and may otherwise consider ValueCommerce for scale
- Steady volume publishers who value regular payouts and may otherwise consider INRDeals for varied models
Who should look elsewhere
- Advertisers seeking minimal entry spend may prefer INRDeals over Awin because of fees of £99+VAT per month + 3.5% per transaction
- Publishers wanting live chat or phone help may prefer ValueCommerce over Awin because support runs on help centre
Perform[cb]
Who it suits
- Publishers running lead, install and sale campaigns at once who would rather hold one account than a specialist network per vertical.
- Media buyers who can clear $50 in earnings and like having Net-15, Weekly payout schedules to work with.
Who should look elsewhere
- Anyone focused on one commission model only: A8.net publishes cpa alone, which is simpler to read.
- Publishers chasing revenue share: AWEmpire lists PPL, PPLR and PPS, which the CPA, CPI and CPL set here does not cover.
- Small volume publishers still building earnings, since the $50 threshold is worth weighing against a lighter setup.
Questions about each
Awin
How is commission set on Awin?+
Commission on Awin is set at advertiser level, so rates vary by program under Commission set by each advertiser. Models cover CPA, CPS and CPL, which suits varied content styles. You compare programs inside Awin before you apply, then promote with Advanced tracking and analytics to record sales and leads.
Which topics and regions does Awin cover?+
Awin serves publishers across global regions with focus on retail, travel and insurance. That mix suits content about shopping, trips and cover products. Programs run through Awin, and performance is measured with Advanced tracking and analytics that supports planning around audience interests.
Perform[cb]
What commission models does Perform[cb] pay on?+
The network pays on CPA, CPI and CPL deals, a broad performance spread rather than one pricing style. That mix suits publishers running lead, install and sale campaigns side by side, and the rate you earn depends on the offer the advertiser is running.
How much do you need before Perform[cb] pays out?+
The minimum payout is $50, a little higher than the €43.85 typical across the networks compared here. On this measure the programme ranks 39 among 105 programmes, so cash flow planning matters more here than at networks with a lower bar.