Updated September 28, 2026 · AffCue Editorial Team

AdultTime vs GayBloom

AdultTime scores 9.1 and GayBloom 8.9 out of 10. Compare their differences and shared features below.

AdultTime

Facts checked September 26, 2026.

GayBloom

Facts checked September 26, 2026.

What sets them apart

AdultTime vs GayBloom
Compare
AdultTimeAdultTime
ReviewSee alternativesSee alternatives
GayBloomGayBloom
ReviewSee alternativesSee alternatives
Commission terms$35 per signup; up to 50% revshare$42 PPS, $2.8 SOI US
NetworksFameDollarsCrakRevenue
Payout per sale or signup$35$42Higher
Recurring commissionYesNot confirmed
Payout threshold$50Not confirmed
Payout methodsCheck, Wire, PaxumNot confirmed
Commission (%)up to 50%Not confirmed

Same on both: Verticals (Adult dating).

We earn a commission when you sign up through links on this site. Partner status can affect where a brand appears in our rankings.

Key differences

  • Payout per sale or signup is higher at GayBloom: $42 vs $35.
  • Networks: only AdultTime offers FameDollars.
  • Networks: only GayBloom offers CrakRevenue.
  • Pricing model: only AdultTime offers Revshare.

Our verdict on each

AdultTime

AdultTime pays a fixed amount for each signup and adds a revenue share on top, which suits publishers already running adult dating content. With $35 per signup; up to 50% revshare and a payout threshold of $50, it is a practical pick for smaller sites.

Read the full AdultTime review

GayBloom

GayBloom fits North American publishers with adult dating traffic who want a single CPA payment rather than a revshare deal. It pays $42 PPS, $2.8 SOI US through CrakRevenue, a clear per-signup figure for an audience that already matches adult dating.

Read the full GayBloom review

Every fact side by side

AdultTime vs GayBloom
FactAdultTimeGayBloom
Pricing modelCPA, RevshareCovers moreCPA
FeaturesDirect, ReferralNot confirmed
RegionNot confirmedNorth america

Where each stands against the rest

AdultTime vs GayBloom
FactAdultTimeGayBloomMedian
Payout threshold$50at the medianNot confirmed$50
Commission (%)up to 50%highest quarterNot confirmed12
Payout per sale or signup$35lowest quarter$42lowest quarter$160

Median across 178 listed affiliate programs.

Pros and cons

AdultTime

Pros

  • Terms stack a signup payment with a revenue share: $35 per signup; up to 50% revshare.
  • Recurring commission is offered, so renewals keep paying after the initial payment.
  • Link and referral tracking both count, since direct and referral covers either route.

Cons

  • The programme covers adult dating only, so a mixed site has little else here to promote.
  • All tracking and reporting sit inside FameDollars, which narrows who you can compare with.
  • A transfer needs $50 in the balance, so a quiet month waits.

GayBloom

Pros

  • Pays $42 PPS, $2.8 SOI US, with the per-conversion amount at $42.
  • Runs on CrakRevenue, so tracking and payout handling sit with a known network.
  • The offer is built for adult dating traffic, so the audience matches the payout.

Cons

  • Revenue share is not among the programme's model, which lists cpa, so commission is tied to a single approved conversion.
  • north america covers North America, so traffic from other markets sits outside the offer.
  • Commission runs through a single network, CrakRevenue, so approval and payout depend on a single partner.

Who each suits

AdultTime

Who it suits

  • Adult site owners who already promote paid subscriptions and can pass signups through a network link.
  • Publishers who want a low bar for a first transfer, since $50 is easy to reach.
  • Anyone happy to concentrate on one niche, as the programme covers adult dating.

Who should look elsewhere

  • AWEmpire (LiveJasmin family, casual-dating tier) if you want a casual-dating tier in your mix, since the offer here sits in adult dating.
  • Nemora AI if you would rather have a flat lifetime percentage, as it lists 50% on every sale for life.
  • MetArt Network if recurring revenue share is the priority, as it lists 50% recurring revenue share.

GayBloom

Who it suits

  • Publishers already running adult dating audiences in North America.
  • Media buyers set up to optimise signups against a CPA offer.
  • Publishers whose traffic sits inside adult dating.

Who should look elsewhere

  • Publishers who want recurring revenue share, since the model is cpa; MetArt Network pays 50% recurring revenue share.
  • Publishers chasing traffic outside north america, where global programmes make up 60% of the adult dating category.
  • Publishers who need the window defined in the offer itself, since attribution runs through CrakRevenue and the median window in the adult dating ranking is 90 days.

Country by country

AdultTime vs GayBloom
CountryAdultTimeGayBloom
United StatesNoYes

Questions about each

AdultTime

How much does a signup earn?+

The programme pays a flat amount for every new signup, $35, and adds a revenue share on top. The written terms read $35 per signup; up to 50% revshare, so a publisher can weight the offer toward whichever side suits the audience. The rate ceiling on the revenue share is listed separately as up to 50%.

Which commission models does it use?+

The listed models are cpa and revshare, so a fixed per signup payment and a share of revenue sit on the same offer. Publishers can weigh a quick upfront payment against longer term subscription income, and both can run on the same link.

GayBloom

How much does GayBloom pay per conversion?+

The payout is $42 per conversion, set out in $42 PPS, $2.8 SOI US. GayBloom pays on a CPA basis, so the amount is tied to an approved signup rather than to a share of what the subscriber spends. The programme runs through CrakRevenue, which handles the conversion.

Does GayBloom pay commission every month?+

The model listed is cpa, which is cost per action. Commission is a single payment per approved conversion, so a subscriber who stays active does not produce further earnings. Publishers who want income that repeats each period should compare a revenue share programme instead.

AdultTime

AdultTime

Higher score in this comparison

See alternatives